Rajpal Yadav has been in a legal dispute since the past few months. After he got bail in the Rs 9-crore debt case and was released from Tihar jail, the actor was given time to repay the loan, but he continued to violate the court’s order. For those who are unaware, there is a legal dispute between Rajpal Yadav and Madhavav Gopal Agrawal who represents M/s Murali Projects Pvt Ltd. According to the court’s verdict on Friday, Yadav received no relief and was sentenced to three months in jail.Explaining why the actor was sentenced to three months in jail, lawyer Avnish Sikka, representing Murli Projects Pvt Ltd, said, “Today, the case filed by Rajpal Yadav has been stayed pending the order,” ANI reported. According to delhi high court According to the judgment, all 21 cases filed by Rajpal Yadav were dismissed and the order passed by the Sessions Court was upheld. The court sentenced him to three months in prison; he was also ordered to pay a fine of 1.05 billion rupees in each case. The sentences of three months’ imprisonment must run concurrently. Mrs. Radha Rajpal Yadav is also one of the accused in these cases. She was ordered to pay a fine of Rs 5 lakh in each case. During sentencing in the case, his attorney prayed for a reprieve. The court denied him probation relief. The court has taken into account his repeated breaches of undertakings given to the court and the fact that Rajpal Yadav said on his last day: “I am ready to go to jail five times but will not pay a penny.” He has two months to either comply with the order or challenge it in the Supreme Court. “For those who are unaware, businessman Madhav Gopal Agrawal, who had earlier loaned Rajpal Rs 5 crore for his 2012 directorial venture Ata Pata Laapata, had said that he agreed to the loan after Rajpal’s wife Radha sent him an emotional message seeking help. He stressed that the agreement clearly stipulates that repayment will not be affected by the film’s box office performance, censorship certification or any other obstacles. The actor also offered a personal guarantee, he said. The businessman added that the deal was strictly a loan and not an investment, noting that investments typically do not involve personal guarantees or postdated checks.Yadav has since denied returning the money. Agarwal also said that early in the conflict, he visited the actor’s residence and “cryed like a child in front of him,” explaining that the funds he lent were themselves borrowed from others. He said he repeatedly asked Rajpal for specific dates so that a new agreement could be drafted.
